EN ISO 25239-3-2011 摩擦搅拌焊.铝.第3部分:焊接操作员资格(ISO25239-3-2011).德文版本ENISO25239-3-2011
作者:标准资料网 时间:2024-04-29 13:44:29 浏览:9900
来源:标准资料网
【英文标准名称】:Frictionstirwelding-Aluminium-Part3:Qualificationofweldingoperators(ISO25239-3:2011);GermanversionENISO25239-3:2011
【原文标准名称】:摩擦搅拌焊.铝.第3部分:焊接操作员资格(ISO25239-3-2011).德文版本ENISO25239-3-2011
【标准号】:ENISO25239-3-2011
【标准状态】:现行
【国别】:
【发布日期】:2012-03
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:欧洲标准学会(EN)
【起草单位】:
【标准类型】:()
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:
【英文主题词】:Alloys;Aluminium;Aluminiumalloys;Approvalperiod;Blankforms;Buttseams;Conditions;Destructivetesting;Experts;Frictionstirwelding;Joiningprocess;Joiningprocesses;Lightmetals;Operators;Personnel;Qualifications;Repeattests;Specification(approval);Tensilestrength;Testcertificate;Testcertificates;Testspecimens;Testwelding;Testing;Training;Validity;Visualinspection(testing);Weldability;Weldedjoints;Weldertraining;Welders;Welding;Weldingengineering;Weldingprocedurespecification;Weldingprocesses;Weldingspecialists;Weldingwork
【摘要】:
【中国标准分类号】:J33
【国际标准分类号】:25_160_01;25_160_10
【页数】:18P;A4
【正文语种】:英语
Product Code:SAE J551/15
Title:Vehicle Electromagnetic Immunity--Electrostatic Discharge (Esd)
Issuing Committee:Electromagnetic Compatibility (Emc) Standards
Scope: This SAE Standard specifies the ESD test methods and procedures necessary to evaluate electronic modules intended for vehicle use. It describes test procedures for evaluating electronic modules on the bench as well as for evaluating complete vehicles. A procedure for calibrating the simulator that is used to generate the electrostatic discharges is given. Functional status classifications for immunity to ESD are given.【英文标准名称】:StandardPracticeforCategorizingWoodandWood-BasedProductsAccordingtoTheirFiberSources
【原文标准名称】:木材和木基产品按照光纤光源分类的标准惯例
【标准号】:ASTMD7612-2010
【标准状态】:现行
【国别】:
【发布日期】:2010
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:美国材料与试验协会(US-ASTM)
【起草单位】:D07.08
【标准类型】:(Practice)
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:有保证的来源;光纤采购系统;森林;森林认证;森林管理;法律渊源;保护性林业资源;负责任的供应商
【英文主题词】:certifiedsources;fiberprocurementsystem;forests;forestcertification;forestmanagement;legalsources;protectiveforestrysources;responsiblesources
【摘要】:Voluntaryforestcertificationsystemshavebecomeanimportantfactorinpromotingsustainableforestmanagement.Thestandardsinusearehighlyvariable,however.Evenwithinafamilyofstandardswithacommonlabelthereisthepotentialforwidevariationsinpractices.Thispreventsproducersandconsumersfromusingacertificationlabeltocharacterizeproductsaccordingtoaspecificsetofqualitiesorvalues.Thispracticecreatesaframeworktodifferentiateproductsbasedonasetofqualitiesandvaluesidentifiedasimportantinthemarketforwoodproducts.Thispracticeisintendedtobeusedbyproducers,distributors,retailers,orconsumerswhowishtounderstandwhereaproductfitswithinthreecategories.Ataminimum,theuserwillneedtoknowthegeographicoriginofthewoodgoingintoaproductandwhetheritislabeledorotherwisecertifiedtoaprocurementsystemorchainofcustodybasedonavoluntaryforestmanagementorcertificationstandard.Producerswhowanttousethispracticemustbeabletoidentifythegeographicoriginofthewoodtoatleastthelevelneededtosupporttheclaimstoconsumersassociatedwithagivencategoryanddescribedin6.1.1.1Thispracticesetsforthminimumcriteriaandevaluationrequirementsforproductsemployingtheuseofdifferentsystemstotracewoodfibertosourcesoperatingunderdifferentforestmanagementorforestcertificationsystems.1.2Thepurposeofthispracticeistoprovidewoodproductsmanufacturers,distributors,andretailerswithasystemtoprovideclear,objectiveinformationtocommunicatetoconsumersregardingproductconformancetodifferentwoodfibertracingsystemswithinspecificforestmanagementorforestcertificationprograms.Itprovidesastructurethatsegregatesthedifferenttypesoflabelsandtracingsystemsinuseamongmajorforestcertificationstandardsandothervoluntaryandregulatorystandardsgoverningtheproductionofforestproducts.Note18212;Theprinciplesinthispracticeapplyinternationally,providedthattherequiredinformationisavailabletosupportcategorization.Forexample,productscertifiedtothegloballyrecognizedforestcertificationstandardswillmeetthex201C;CertifiedSourcesx201D;categoryregardlessoftheirorigin,anddocumentedriskassessments(notedinAppendixX5)providethebasisuponwhichrawmaterialssourcedfromCanadaandtheUnitedStatescanbedeemedtomeetthex201C;LegalSourcesx201D;category.TocategorizerawmaterialssourcedoutsideofCanadaandtheUnitedStatesasx201C;LegalSources,x201D;itisrecommendedthattheadoptingentitydevelopsupplementalprovisionstoaddresscountry-specificissuesasneeded.1.2.1Thispracticeprovidesanobjectivebasistodifferentiateamong:1.2.1.1Non-controversial(thatis,legal)sourcesofforestproducts,1.2.1.2Responsiblesourcesofforestproducts(thatis,non-controversialsourcestogetherwithcertifiedprocurementsystemsorfromforestsmanagedusingresponsiblepractices),and1.2.1.3Certifiedsourcesofforestproducts(thatis,non-controversialsourcestogetherwithcertifiedchainofcustody).1.2.2ThispracticeisintendedtoprovideaframeworktohelpwoodproductvendorsidentifythecompetentandreliableevidenceneededtosubstantiateproductclaimsasrequiredbytheU.S.FederalTradeCommissionx2019;sGuidesfortheUseofEnvironmentalMarketingClaims(alsoknownasx201C;
